Evening officers,

I am acting in my capacity as chair of the Peter Rohde Hate Group (NLC) 

Before we get started, some music to set the mood

---------

You might be interested in seeing an assortment of conversations I’ve had with Peter Brusch Rohde affixed as [Annexure A].

In these he makes numerous admissions about a wide assortment of controlled substances including LSD, MDMA, Weed, Modafinil, Ritalin, and several amphetamines (“dexies”, Adderall, etc). He can be seen throughout these logs not just having or using these, but also transacting in them and proposing/confirming the execution of such arrangements.

On [page 6 of Annexure A] the existence of a spreadsheet called “Straight up incriminating records of extralegal drug use” is seen referenced. Communications with Mr. Rohde throughout [Annexure A] shows him proposing or confirming the delivery of controlled substances in quantities and/or on dates which correspond with entries made in this spreadsheet. Screenshots of these entries have been included as [Annexure B].

The full mutual relevance between annexure A and annexure B, along with the significance of numbered annotations in the margins of Annexure A, is tabulated in [Annexure C].

I can attest that Mr. Rohde’s made admissions to me in person that his long term partner, Wendy Bruere, manages his drug inventory for him and controls his access to it. I’ve heard rumours that he was out of control before meeting her. While I don’t have records to substantiate this part, there are remarks made by Mr. Rohde on [page 17 of Annexure A] which are circumstantially consistent with premise. I’ve taken the liberty of writing a subpoena for Mrs. Bruere [sW].

Additionally within [Annexure A] Mr. Rohde also admits to numerous related crimes such as:

-fraudulently obtaining an ADHD “diagnosis” so he could be prescribed the “dexies” he was already transacting with and abusing,

-cycling multiple ID’s at different pharmacies to purposely circumvent AFP controls on a precursor to meth (namely sudafed), which he admits he was buying for illegitimate purposes, and

-requesting I destroy evidence which had come into my possession tying him to drug offences.

I can also say (albeit not fully substantiate) that the Peter Rohde free-wheeling drug experience is widely known about in the community, but very few other people are willing to talk about it to the authorities because they don’t have the same luxury I have of consequence-free self-incrimination by virtue of having left the country for good. There is one noteworthy exception.

[REDACTED] (cc’d) was one of Peter Rohde’s former PhD candidates. He is familiar with Mr. Rohde’s drug activities, having been offered many times, but never indulged in it himself. Pursuant to our complaint procedure part 2a(i) [fpr] we are presently in the process of helping [REDACTED] prepare an affidavit, and I’m sure he’s happy to speak to it here as well.

It is further worth noting that [REDACTED] also faced contrived and absurd allegations from Mr. Rohde. Furthermore, another former PhD candidate of Mr. Rohde [REDACTED] may have also faced similar false allegations of “threatening behaviour” by him (we find out soon via subpoena). The fact two of his own former students are eager to testify about him speaks volumes.

[REDACTED] informs me he objects on principle to prosecuting anyone under drug laws, and will not be abandoning his principles just to nail Mr. Rohde. Consequently, he won’t be participating or answering questions unless it is strictly limited in scope to the topic of the part where I mentioned him just now. I respect [REDACTED]’s principles, which is more than I can say about Mr. Rohde.

I suspect, in light of these and other circumstances, that Mr. Rohde may have presented his own drugs as false evidence in complaints that he made about me. If true it would mean he mislead the police by claiming I was banned from his workplace for “being aggressive towards him”.

---------

I’m sure you’re wondering, if the only reason I’m willing to share all this is that I’ve already left, can you even prosecute a case with these materials?

Oh don’t worry, we made sure you could.

Under the Evidence Act of ‘95, a seal or stamp of certification by a foreign notary (equivalent to a Justice of the Peace) is recognised within Australian courts. The relevant parts of the act have been copied over to [law ref 1] for your convenience.

For good measure:

-I have taken my records first to a notary public to have them notarised,The notary was one Juan Cruz located at 1042 Broadway, Brooklyn NY11221

- Then to the Kings County Clerk (which is where Mr. Cruz practices) in order to get them certified. The clerk was one Nancy T Sunshine and the her office is located in the Kings County Supreme Court. .

-Then to an Apostille to get them authorised pursuant to the Hague Convention of 1961.The Apostille was Deputy Secretary of State Witney Clark, located at 123 Williams St, New York NY 10038

More information about this is included [law ref 2].

Original copies of these certified documents have been mailed to Locked Bag 5102, Parramatta, NSW 2124 with instructions indicating that the officers included in this email are expecting them.

Mr. Rohde will be showing up at the Downing Centre Local Court for the final hearing in the matter of 2023/00337553 on September 26. Not only is this a convenient time and place to apprehend him, but it also happens to be just before his birthday on the 28th. It is no secret to anyone who knows Mr. Rohde that he will likely have made preparations by then to celebrate with a most splendid stockpile of controlled substances which he has been saving up just for the occasion.

I am also willing to testify directly against Mr. Rohde on these matters, and will even self incriminate to a limited degree in court, provided I can attend via AVL and thus not be subject to your jurisdiction. An [AVL app] has been partly filled and attached.

---------

I’m sure you’re wondering, if I’m practically immune to prosecution anyway, whats stopping me from just committing perjury to get revenge on Mr. Rohde from afar?

Oh don’t worry, we thought of that too.

You don’t have to trust me because most of my claims can be independently verified by using your subpoena powers as public officers. Better still, you do not need to press any new charges or open any new cases first, as you can just use the subpoena powers in relation to the existing Rohde matter. Even more better still, I’ve taken the liberty of writing the subpoenas needed to verify my claims for you and attached them as [sMQ, sW].

The exact way in which each of these subpoenas independently verifies my claims/materials is explained within their cover page. I understand Con. Liam Monnox (cc’d) is presently managing the Rohde matter and thus is the correct person to file them.

Should I ever face extradition over anything in the materials I willingly provided here, I have only to say to the courts, it was in the public interest to stop Peter Rohde (albeit not for the reasons presently presented).

Our respective nations are founded on crime, yours petty mine treason. 

So if this be crime let us make the most of it, and in the words of Martin Luther, here I stand I can do no other.

L'etat c'est moi amour.